lindaannbound
Site Assistant
Posts: 157 |
Wed, Nov 18, 2009 10:38:07
|
There is a Member who's photo's are anally assaulting a variety of shoe
style's.To each his own,but I found Unappealing .
Now this is entirely My opinion about this Member's photo choice's.And maybe I dont have the right to criticize his content in this forum?I guess if I had not run across so many of His photo's to vote on,I wouldn't be criticizing, but unfortunately I did,so I am.
What do You think?
|
love_me
Premium Member
Posts: 63 |
Wed, Nov 18, 2009 10:56:47 |
I can't say I enjoy such photos, but judging fro the profile comments, others do.
There should be a separate category: "Anal", or maybe rather "Insertion", so it sounds less offending and could also cover urethra inseration, which I don't like either.
It would also be good to have a filter when suing "Show All", e.g. "Show All, but ...". This could then be set in the preferences. But I reckon this is really much work for the site owner.
A new category "Insertion", however, should be easy to do.
|
what a shock!
Member Profile
Posts: |
Wed, Nov 18, 2009 11:12:33
|
I understand your views as I have used such images as examples on other posts, however you surely understand that (JUST as a example) there are some people who dislike males/tv's/crossdressers in heels just as much but there is no way of getting away form that here as it is about 90% of the site?
We have to be tolerable of other peoples likes here (so long as they are their own images of course). Sure there are category's which certain images should be in but then there will always be some which go astray. For example, not all pictures of males in shoes are in the TV/CD section and never will be. There are quite a lot of males here who only like to see women in heels, however have to see many more males in shoes than females just to see the pics they like.
So YES, an insertion category would be easy to create - but would all insertion pictures go in it just like all males post in the CD/TV section? I rest my case.
So there will always be some discrepancy where people will see what they do not like I am afraid and of course you state it is entirey your opinion, but could you please bear in mind that these posts do not just stay in your own forum, but the home page for all to see and consider the members feelings should he or she see this post before calling a members pictures "disgusting" as they may feel exactly the same way about yours?
Thank you
|
lindaannbound
Site Assistant
Posts: 157 |
Wed, Nov 18, 2009 11:32:04
|
Your right and I edited My original post from
disgusting to unappealing.I also removed the Member's name I do feel that some photo's are placed in wrong categories by some Members,even though this particular
fetish is not covered.
|
MFDFF124
Member Profile
Posts: |
Wed, Nov 18, 2009 13:36:40
|
I agree that there needs to be a category for male insertions. I like to look at the extreme heels category but wading through those shots is tough. I am not knocking his pics, although I am not interested in seeing them. However, I suppose that it is extreme... I will send a message to SJ and see what we can do bout that.
|
keet_in_heels
Premium Member
Posts: 164 |
Sat, Nov 21, 2009 21:11:14
| What is termed extreme heels? |
|
|
I was under the impression that extreme heels was extremely high as in, almost if not possible to stand up wearing......... In fact that is how I found the site by searching extreme heels
|
johnnyjake
Premium Member
Member Profile
Posts: 219 |
Sat, Nov 21, 2009 21:22:22 |
|
really? I found it by typing "How many slingback heels can I shove into my bumbum"
|
lindaannbound
Site Assistant
Posts: 157 |
Fri, Nov 27, 2009 22:00:49 |
Huh My search was"Boots-n-Booty" lol
|
Shoeboi
Premium Member
Posts: 318 |
Thu, Dec 03, 2009 00:16:00 |
|
I know who you are talking about and I like to extreme heels not extreme things done to heels.
|
