riftzone
Member Profile
Posts: |
Sun, Nov 01, 2009 17:39:45
|
Seems to me that there has been lots of topics lately that the site assistants should be acting on for the members, which is the whole point of them.
WAS is very active as we can see but surely there are others who should be getting involved in these discussions and not just leaving it to her and also spreading the load. Not sure of how much assistants can and cant do but it would be good to see the others standing up more!!
|
stuthestud
Site Assistant
Posts: 346 |
Sun, Nov 01, 2009 17:52:28
| Agenda or just wondering? |
|
|
You have been here as a member long enought to know the handful of moderators have no access to the control panel or the websites management system. We just send SJ an email and hes got to implement all the work. So given its a free site theres a limit on the data maintenance on top of the must do member support he has on his must do list. If you want to help send SJ a message, but be warned the more you post the more your attacked by the world wide gene pool....So thats why some drop off. OH by the way I am here daily and post all the time. Seems like you need some shoe love so lets post some additional highheel shots and move on..thanks Stu
|
MFDFF124
Member Profile
Posts: |
Mon, Nov 02, 2009 00:30:23
|
|
There is only so much we as assistants can do. I have made many posts and comments in the forums and in direct contact with the site owner to help remove those that post stolen shots and those that abuse the sites and other members. If you have a complaint, send it on and We as assistants will do what we can to help you out and fix the problem or concern.
|
riftzone
Member Profile
Posts: |
Mon, Nov 02, 2009 06:39:09
|
So the real problem here is the fact that the site assistants have very little control as far as changing things, so we are all relying on SJ having the time to do the things we are commenting on. I have no problem with the role the assistants carry out and they do what they can i'm sure. I think my comments really come from the frustration of recent forums where there has been loads of comments and debate but nothing seems to change, the monthly competition is a good example, so is there any point in the forum debate to start with?
They do show many of us have a real interest and care about the site but without knowing what SJ has time to do, or wants to do the same forums keep coming up. Think we just need a bit more leadership maybe.
|
MFDFF124
Member Profile
Posts: |
Mon, Nov 02, 2009 06:44:09
|
|
That is exactly what happens. Suggestions are made to SJ and when he gets the time, then he does what he can. The assistants have very minimal control as to what happens on the site. We have no access to the server what so ever, and I think it should stay that way. I personally don't want access to that, There are too many thinkgs that can be messed up is that permission is given to the admins...
|
winnipegguy
Site Assistant
Posts: 98 |
Mon, Nov 02, 2009 07:45:12 |
...Small Army ..... Large Community
We use all the help we can get
|
MFDFF124
Member Profile
Posts: |
Mon, Nov 02, 2009 13:43:18
|
|
That is a very good way to put it. There are many members and not many assistants and of course only one captain!!!
|
sluttyheels
Member Profile
Posts: |
Tue, Nov 03, 2009 01:04:02
|
I am sure if they had any power they would use it sooner, maybe not having to wait a year to find out we had a fraud in our midst... and thats just one, it cant be so unusual surely... the law of averages must say there is bound to be more... this is the internet, no one is ever who they appear to be..
i dont really understand why it had to be proved that emmaukbabe was a fraud before he/she was banned...who did u have to prove it to? and wont it be easy for them to come back with a different email address???
there is nothing stopping anyone copying any pictures here and using them either on their profiles here or on other sites, there is no protection.
|
riftzone
Member Profile
Posts: |
Tue, Nov 03, 2009 07:07:08
|
Yes your right SH but thats just part of the cyber world, we can be who or what ever we want as long as you can find some pics that match it.
Guess it's true that if it looks to good to be true then it is, except in your case of course LOL.
I thunk SJ can tell if the same person comes back by the IP address but if they change computers then we will never know, Just all part of the crazy cyber world we play in!!
RZ XX
|
what a shock!
Member Profile
Posts: |
Wed, Nov 04, 2009 21:32:21
|
Dear all.
To answer part of Sluttyheels question - Quote "i dont really understand why it had to be proved that emmaukbabe was a fraud before he/she was banned...who did u have to prove it to? and wont it be easy for them to come back with a different email address??? " please let me explain why I did all this. It may seem i have no life but when I care about this site, and something was so obvious to me it increasingly frustrated me over the last year.
It had to be proved because SJ will not just delete a profile without valid justification. This will be a lengthy post but I thought I would put down why I did it all and persisted for so long.
It has bugged me for a long long time and was obvious to me from day one that it was not a genuine profile so I put my opinions and reasons to SJ about why I think it is a fraud but as we do not always see eye to eye on things (although thankfully we do on most) and that emma hadn't done anything wrong, then the member remained.
I wanted to prove it as I knew fully well the images were false and I will give a few reasons as to what convinced me from the start.
1). They were general modelling shots which you can spot a mile off. They were nothing to do with shoe fetish at all. IN fact it suggested to me they were stocking fetish shots, so that is where I started. Trawling stocking fetish sites.
I had this discussion with several members before who spoke to her (or him) a lot and it bugged me that this person was pretending to be the person in the pics. I dont know why - perhaps it was just the sheer disshonesty and lack of respect for the site rules.
2). I also wanted to prove it as there are only a few of us genuine women here, and if emma - or should i say Marie was one of them she would have been a welcome addition. However the member never got involved with any discussions or whatever which I know is no crime, but it seems the few women on here are all active.
3). The pics were never updated. Which suggested to me they were just a mass upload one and then left forever
4). They were blatantly pro-am shots. IF the member was genuine they have the right to post those shots of course. However shots of that calibre are usually done for pay sites, or for sites of your own. So why would the member give the pics away for free - and if they did not mind doing that, then why was there no links or mention of her profile of a professional site?
5). The backgrounds we all obviously staged bar a couple of them. With false monitors and other equipment - just like a pro photoshoot.
Alas, many things kept telling me this person was not genuine.
Finally, my final straw came when:-
6) Then, I started receiving emails of him/her. These emails were from very much a male point of view and in some, saying what they would like to do to me? I am sure SH, being a genuine lady you know exactly the type of crude email I mean. This is not something a woman would send to another woman who they had hardly spoke to before.
So, there were many reasons why I wanted to prove it - some for my own sanity, but also for other members who were asking me about her.
You are right - if we assistants had the power to remove then she/he would have gone long ago by my opinion, however perhaps it is good that SJ has to vet everything first. it is just unfortunate that as someone else said - so many members and only one who can do the editing.
Hence why I try and do a lot of the legwork on behalf of SJ, send him my suggestions and my reasonings for action and most of the time they are sorted very quickly.
So, I hope that clarifies why i felt I had to do this about emma. The first reason is that SJ will not just delete someone without me, or anyone putting forward a good case for them to be deleted.
I do feel a bit sly and tight about it all, but when many people were emailing me and saying "have you spoken to emma, she's lovely and has a hot profile etc" it started to grate me that people were being bullshitted and I know what some members are like, they could well be bearing their souls to what they thought was a beautiful girl, and it was probably a bloke. Sure, it happens on the net all the time - but when you are sure about it then why not try to do something about it.
Sluttyheels - I am sure you can understand this reason too. I was also persistent because as you all know, I dont really take part in the competitions (think I have done 1?) but to some who competitions and leaderboards are important, as I know there are to you - then it angered me that this member was posting pro images and getting higher scores then genuine members pics which is what the site is about.
(btw YES, emmaukbabe74 or should i say emmaukBLOKE74 has already rejoined with a hillarious pic - STOLEN again for sure. Its hillarious - check it out. I have told SJ so will ask him to remove it once again and possible block his IP).
|
keet_in_heels
Premium Member
Posts: 164 |
Sat, Nov 07, 2009 20:49:57
|
|
Although it may seem very plausable to block an IP add it is not quite so easy a lot of servers use what is known to us geeks is a system called DHCP basically what happens is when you log on to a server yours that is it gives you a new IP address every time. the main reason being there are only a certain allocated number of addresses per server law of averages comes into play not all of the registered users will be online all the time so a lot less addresses are needed. This may sound a bit confusing but its dificult for a geek to explain.
|
